Tax, particularly international tax, is a key issue for us, our stakeholders and other interested parties.
The tax we pay is an important part of our wider economic and social impact and plays a key role in the development of the countries where we operate. We regard it as a critical element of our commitment to grow in a sustainable, responsible and socially inclusive way. Find out more about how we’re Supporting sustainable development (PDF 427KB) through our tax contributions.
Our Code of Business Principles
Our Code sets the standards we live by
Our Code of Business Principles (PDF 8.99MB) sets out the standards of behaviour we expect all employees to adhere to. This is no different when it comes to taxation. Tax evasion is illegal. We have a clear responsibility to comply in full with the laws in the countries in which we operate. We also choose to do this by respecting not only the letter of the law, but also the underlying tax policy intent.
We need to square our responsibilities as a co-operative, compliant taxpayer in each country where we operate, with the need to support competitive business growth. We must serve all our stakeholders, including investors, suppliers and employees. Sometimes this means that the total tax we pay in a particular country will decrease due to changes in our business model. For example, a decision to close a factory in a certain country would result in a change to the amount – and the jurisdiction – of the tax paid.
These are important business decisions taken to ensure our future competitiveness. We recognise that they sometimes negatively impact a country’s tax revenue. However, without taking these decisions the overall tax raising potential of our business would decrease.
Building trust through transparency
Rebuilding trust in the global corporate tax system is vital. When the public loses trust in that system, the relationship between corporates and society is damaged, which is good for neither.
Graeme Pitkethly, Unilever CFO
Addressing public concerns that some multinationals are not paying their fair share of tax, requires technical international tax reforms and better efforts to improve public understanding and awareness. We think that providing user-friendly information about our corporate tax position to a broad range of stakeholders plays an important role in improving transparency and public trust.
We support the OECD international tax reform work on Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS). As we operate in a global competitive environment, we urge tax policymakers to implement international tax reform in a coherent, co-ordinated way so that there is a level playing field and the risk of paying tax twice on the same income is minimised.
Our tax strategy
Centralising parts of our business means we can offer consumers innovative products quickly. By bringing together activities in one location, we create efficiencies and economies of scale, which create value for our consumers and our shareholders. As a result, there are many transactions between Unilever Group companies, and the transfer pricing for these transactions must reflect an arm’s-length or market price. Our pricing is driven by the activities undertaken and the value created in each part of our business, and is in accordance with the OECD transfer pricing guidelines.
Paying the right amount of tax, at the right time, and in the right countries
Corporate income tax is payable on the profits made by the companies in the Unilever Group. Profits are calculated after deducting business expenses and legislated tax reliefs – such as depreciation on equipment and R&D incentives – as provided by the tax laws in the countries where we operate.
We aim to pay the right amount of tax at the right time, on the profits we make, and in the countries where we create the value that generates those profits.
This means that we must:
Respect the tax laws applicable in each country, including not only the letter of the law but the tax policy intent underlying the tax law
Understand how and where the different companies in the Unilever Group contribute to creating value, and ensure that our transfer prices – the prices paid on transactions between companies in the Unilever Group – properly reflect where value is created
Prepare and file all tax returns in the form specified and at the time required
Prepare and retain the documentation required by the tax laws or which will be needed to answer any questions raised by tax auditors
Employ appropriately qualified and trained tax professionals with the right levels of tax expertise and understanding of Unilever’s business
As the tax laws are not always clear, getting this right often requires careful judgement. This must be consistently applied across around 400 corporate income tax returns that the Unilever Group files annually.
400Corporate income tax returns completed by Unilever every year
The tax authorities in the countries where we operate may not agree with some of the judgements we make. This happens most often in the area of transfer pricing. There can be different views from different jurisdictions’ tax authorities of where value is created, and therefore which country has the right to tax the profits.
Our biggest challenge is to ensure that we pay tax only once on the profits and that we can recover centrally incurred business expenses from Group companies. Unfortunately, the current international system for resolving tax disputes often falls short of what is needed.
In line with our tax principles, we are transparent about our approach to tax. In 2021, for the first time, we published a full list of tax paid and tax contributions by country of operation for the 2020 reporting period.
PDF 1.49MB
Our tax principles
Our tax principles are a clear articulation of our tax governance framework and, in those cases where judgements are required, they illustrate our perspective on tax risk. These principles have been approved by the Board’s Audit Committee.
We act at all times in accordance with all applicable laws and are guided by relevant international standards (for example OECD Guidelines). We aim to comply with the spirit as well as the letter of the law.
We are transparent about our approach to tax. We regularly put forward understandable, timely and transparent communication about our tax policy and total tax payments.
We aim to pay an appropriate amount of tax according to where value is created within the normal course of commercial activity. Any transfer pricing is always calculated using the ‘arm’s-length’ principle.
Our approach to transfer pricing
We try to obtain certainty. Firstly, by ensuring that our transfer pricing policies are consistently applied across the Group. Secondly, by entering into Advance Pricing Agreements with the relevant country tax authorities, based on full disclosure of all relevant information. We want to pay all the tax that is due, we just don’t want to pay tax twice on the same profits.
We do not use contrived or abnormal tax structures that are intended for tax avoidance, have no commercial substance, and do not meet the spirit of local or international law.
Secrecy jurisdictions, or so-called ‘tax havens’, are not used for tax avoidance.
Tax havens
We use the OECD definition of tax havens and as at 31 December 2020, we had four (2019: 12) companies in the Unilever Group located in countries identified as tax havens: two in Panama, one in Jersey and one in the Isle of Man.
The Panama companies are both operating companies: one is a marketing and sales company and the other provides regional services including logistics. The Jersey and Isle of Man companies are both holding companies which are UK tax resident and therefore subject to tax in the UK.
During 2018, Unilever completed an acquisition and, as part of that acquisition, acquired eight companies based in the British Virgin Islands. Unilever has now unwound this structure and these legal entities have been liquidated in line with our global tax principles.
We only seek rulings from tax authorities to confirm the applicable treatment, based on full disclosure of the relevant facts.
We respect the right of governments to determine their own tax structures, rates of tax and collection mechanisms.
We seek to develop strong, mutually respectful relationships with national tax authorities, based on transparency and trust. Where countries have weak or poorly constructed fiscal regulation and/or institutions, we support work to help develop the capability of tax authorities and systems.
Our approach
We promote open, transparent working relationships with tax authorities and early engagement in advance of undertaking transactions and filing tax returns.
In the Netherlands, we engage with the Dutch tax authorities through regular meetings, calls and correspondence. This includes discussing the tax impacts of potential future events in advance. This constructive co-operation between Unilever and the Dutch tax authorities results in transparency as well as faster and greater clarity on Unilever’s positions and ensures working as much as possible in real time.
In the UK, we have an open and transparent relationship with HMRC (Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs). We engage co-operatively with regular face-to-face meetings and calls. Any issues are discussed on a real-time basis, including pre-filing meetings in advance of filing our tax returns.
In Australia, we are a signatory to the Board of Taxation's Voluntary Tax Transparency Code. This aims to enhance the community’s understanding of the corporate sector’s compliance with Australia’s tax laws. It outlines a set of principles and minimum standards to guide the disclosure of tax information by businesses. Further information on the Code and its full Catalogue of Signatories is available from the Australian Board of Taxation.
Our open approach helps us with our goal of achieving certainty over tax positions. However, this approach is not always possible. In some developing countries, for example, we face significant challenges in reaching agreements. In some cases, we find regional and national tax authorities taking different views on the same issue.
As well as engaging with tax authorities directly, we also talk to them as part of trade bodies like the Confederation of British Industry (CBI) in the UK and VNO (The Confederation of Netherlands Industry and Employers) in the Netherlands. We take part in working groups, such as those set up to engage on new legislation arising from BEPS. We help tax authorities develop expertise and understanding of our industry. In partnership with the OECD Tax & Development team, we’ve run business sector knowledge sessions for tax authorities in Africa and Latin America.
We ensure that as a business, we have the mechanisms in place to adhere to the above principles and provide both relevant training and opportunities for employees to raise any issues of concern confidentially, consistent with the Unilever Code of Business Principles. We report annually to the Board on adherence to the Unilever Tax Principles.
We report to our Board’s Audit Committee on tax strategy and provide updates on tax regulation and key tax challenges we are facing. The Audit Committee receives an annual update on the Group’s effective tax rate, tax provisions, key tax issues for the coming year, and compliance with our Tax Principles.
We have a Tax Principles scorecard to assess whether material transactions or changes in the way we do business comply with our Tax Principles. The scorecard is completed by our Tax managers and reviewed by senior members of our Tax team. Material transactions must be scored against the various Tax Principles, and the transactions will not be approved unless they achieve a certain score. In 2020, a total of 18 (2019: 16) scorecards were completed.
Our tax team
Unilever’s Tax team is part of our Finance function, which reports to the Group Chief Financial Officer. Our Executive Vice President of Global Tax & Treasury leads a senior team of around 80 people. They have specific geographic and technical responsibilities, including specialists in Transfer Pricing, Indirect Taxes and Employment Taxes. Advice is sought from external advisors on material transactions and whenever the necessary expertise is not available in-house.
The Tax function is organised on a global basis. This ensures we have globally consistent tax policies, strategies and processes, and can invest in the team’s continuing professional development. Most of our Tax team works with our operations in a country with only a few central roles, allowing the Tax team to stay closely connected to Unilever’s business and the tax developments in the country.
Tax function responsibilities & organisation
Tax evasion and criminal facilitation of tax evasion is illegal. The UK introduced new legislation on 30 September 2017 called the Criminal Finance Act. Part III of the Act describes a Corporate Criminal Offence for the Failure to Prevent the Facilitation of Tax Evasion.
This applies automatically to a Corporation where an associated person (employee or third party) acting for or on behalf of the Corporation criminally facilitates tax evasion. Acting in this way is in clear contravention of Unilever’s Tax Principles. Doing so risks criminal prosecution of the individuals involved, as well as placing unnecessary risks on Unilever. We maintain a zero-tolerance approach to dealing with such behaviour.
We follow HMRC’s guidelines to continuously improve prevention procedures both in the UK and across Unilever. We continue to adopt reasonable prevention procedures, which are proportional to the risks inherent in our business.
Managing our tax risk
Exercising judgement on tax sensitive items consistently across the Unilever Group means our employees need a common understanding of Unilever’s perspective on tax risk. We’ve adopted a set of global tax principles covering areas such as transfer pricing, use of tax havens and relationships with tax authorities.
As a business, we’re subject to taxation in the many countries in which we operate. The tax legislation in these countries differs, is often complex and subject to interpretation by management and the government authorities. Recent developments in the international tax arena have increased the likelihood of changes to tax systems in the countries where we operate, and this creates added uncertainty.
How we manage our tax risk
Risks are managed through our Tax Risk Framework. They are monitored through a web-based tool for collecting details on a quarterly basis of all our corporate income tax exposures and provisions. The tool has an approval process for any new provisions or changes to existing provisions. It also includes an Annual Compliance Checklist, in which the tax lead in the countries concerned confirms that all their statutory tax obligations have been met, their controls are operating effectively, and all tax positions are in compliance with our Tax Principles.
We centrally monitor the filing of all corporate income tax returns and related tax payments. A key way to manage tax exposure is to be as ‘current’ as possible in agreeing the final tax liability for the tax year with the tax authority. So we monitor and seek to minimise the number of open tax years where final agreement has not yet been reached.
Our Tax Risk Framework
Our Tax Risk Framework sets out the key tax risks and the mitigating actions that we take to manage and monitor those risks. There are five key risk areas covered by the Tax Risk Framework – policy, governance & organisation, people, compliance & documentation, and reporting & risk management.
Examples of a risk and mitigating action for each of the five key risk areas:
Policy
Governance & Organisation
People
Compliance & Documentation
Reporting & Risk Management
Risk:
Transactions and behaviours not in line with Tax Principles
Risk:
Lack of right organisational structure to implement strategy
Risk:
Insufficient tax training
Risk:
Failure to comply with statutory obligations
Risk:
Tax positions not accurately reflected in reporting
Mitigating action:
Annual compliance confirmation and completion of scorecard for certain transactions
Mitigating action:
Organisational structure regularly reviewed by Tax Leadership Team
Mitigating action:
Regular global, regional and local training sessions, plus individual development plans
Mitigating action:
Annual compliance checklists plus online compliance tracking tool
Mitigating action:
Online tool to collect and approve direct tax exposures and provisions
Tax in our Annual Report and Accounts
The Unilever Group consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS).
Unilever’s business generates considerable tax income for the governments in the countries in which we operate. In addition to corporation taxes, we pay and collect numerous other taxes. These include employee taxes, sales taxes, customs duties and local transaction taxes. During 2020, we made global tax payments of €7.1 billion (2019: €8 billion) (our Total Tax Contribution). This comprised €3.3 billion of taxes borne by Unilever, and €3.8 billion of taxes collected from employees and customers on behalf of governments. ‘Other taxes’ include sustainability taxes, stamp duties (and equivalent), excise duty, service taxes, property taxes, local business taxes, social and educational taxes.
Total tax paid by type in 2020
Tax type
Tax paid in 2020 (€ million)
Corporate tax
1,875
Sales taxes
325
Customs duties
186
Employment taxes
595
Other taxes
283
Total tax borne
3,264
Corporate tax paid by region in 2020
Region
Tax paid in 2020 (€ million)
Asia/Africa
1,146
India
425
Indonesia
131
Philippines
123
Other Asia/Africa
467
Americas
461
USA
149
Brazil
112
Mexico
47
Other Americas
153
Europe
269
Switzerland
70
France
45
Germany
36
Other Europe
117
Note: the countries listed in bullets under the regions are the three largest tax payers by region.
There are a number of reasons why the corporate tax cash payments in a particular year will be different from the corporate tax charge in the financial statements, including:
Timing differences: Tax payments relating to a particular year’s profits will typically be due partly in the current year and partly in the following year.
Deferred tax: The Group tax charge includes deferred tax which is an accounting adjustment arising from timing differences. These occur when an item has to be included in the financial statements in one year but is required to be taxed/deducted for tax in another year.
Uncertain tax positions: We are subject to taxation in the many countries in which we operate. The tax legislation of these countries differs, is often complex and is subject to interpretation by management and the government authorities. These matters of judgement may mean we need to make provision for possible tax payments in future years. We make provisions against individual exposures and take into account the specific circumstances of each case. These include the strength of technical arguments, recent case law decisions or rulings on similar issues, and relevant external advice. The provision is estimated based on one of two methods: the expected value method or the single most likely amount method, depending on which is expected to better predict the resolution of the uncertainty. Approximately half of our uncertain tax provisions relate to judgements on transfer pricing where there is the potential for disputes due to tax authorities potentially having a different point of view on where value is created.
Our effective tax rate in 2020
Our Effective Tax Rate (ETR) in 2020 was 24.6% (2019: 27.9%). This is our worldwide corporate tax charge in the Unilever Annual Report and Accounts of €1,923 million (2019: €2,263 million), shown as a percentage of the worldwide Group profit before tax.
Note 6A (page 131 of the 2020 Annual Report and Accounts) to the Group consolidated financial statements provides a tax reconciliation on a Group basis of the 2020 effective tax rate of 25% to the expected tax rate of 23% (the weighted average rate applicable in the countries where we made our profits). In addition, where there is a requirement to prepare local company financial statements, this will also generally include an effective tax rate reconciliation for the local company.
Our Group tax reconciliation also shows our underlying effective tax rate of 23%. The difference between this and the reported rate of 25% is due to the tax impact of non-underlying items. In particular, it is due to the impact of taxes payable on the reorganisation of our European business and taxes related to the UK tax audit of intangible income and centralised services.
The main reconciling items in the 2020 financial statements between the expected rate of 23% and the underlying effective tax rate (23%) include:
1. An aggregate increase in the tax rate of 4% due to
withholding taxes on dividends paid by subsidiary companies, which cannot be offset against any other taxes due (2%)
business expenses that are not allowed as a deduction for tax purposes (1%)
withholding taxes on other cross-border payments, such as royalties and service fees, which cannot be offset against any other taxes due (1%)
2. An aggregate decrease in the tax rate of 4% due to
benefits from preferential tax regimes that have been legislated by the countries and provinces concerned in order to promote economic development and investment (2%), see further detail below regarding tax incentives
income tax reserve adjustments (1%)
other favourable items including tax settlements and one-off benefits (1%).
The Group’s future tax charge and effective tax rate could be affected by several factors. These include changes in tax laws and their interpretation, still to be determined tax reform proposals in the EU, the continuing OECD international tax reform work, as well as the impact of acquisitions, disposals and any restructuring of our businesses.
Withholding taxes on dividends – UK and the Netherlands
With effect from 29 November 2020, Unilever NV merged into Unilever PLC.
Dividend withholding taxes suffered by Unilever PLC
Unilever PLC receives dividends (both directly and indirectly) from subsidiary companies. In many countries, particularly developing and emerging ones, these dividend payments are subject to withholding tax. For the purposes of our tax paid by region analysis, the withholding taxes are reported in the country of the paying company, but this withholding tax is actually a cost to the recipient of the dividend.
This tax cannot be offset against other taxes due as the dividend income is not generally taxed in the UK or in intermediate holding companies in the Netherlands. For 2020, the total dividend withholding tax suffered by the parent and intermediate holding companies was €142 million (2019: €84 million).
Dividend withholding taxes collected by Unilever NV and Unilever PLC
During 2020, Unilever NV also collected €432 million in dividend WHT from dividends paid to external shareholders. This is a tax cost to the external shareholder. There is no dividend withholding tax on dividends paid by PLC to its shareholders.
Tax incentives
Tax incentives are government measures that are intended to influence business decision-making or encourage businesses to invest in a particular way, by reducing the amount of tax they have to pay. A number of the territories in which we operate offer incentives of various kinds. We seek to use these incentives where they are aligned with our business and operational objectives, and where they require economic substance in order for the tax incentive to be granted.
Tax incentives in practice - Turkey
Turkey provides tax investment regimes for large industrial projects. Currently, Unilever has two projects benefiting from the incentive. The first is an ice cream factory and the second is a factory which makes cleaning and beauty & personal care products, both located in the province of Konya in Central Anatolia. The incentives are granted to help develop this and other regions in Turkey. The benefit is in the form of a lower tax rate on the profits generated from the sale of goods manufactured in those factories.